Karl Vick: In Sierra Leone, which I passed through on my out of Liberia on Monday, the customary greeting is: "How da body?"
________________________________________________ Oakland, Calif.: What are your thoughts regarding the absence of any U.S. moral leadership in response to the Liberian crisis. I am saddened especially by the absence of any organized response or pressure from the African American political leadership. If there is not an African country that is more deserving of our support, I don't know one. Karl Vick: My thoughts are no more profound or outraged than those of the US's partners on the Security Council, who blandly point out the following:
________________________________________________ Betheda, Md.: Can you very briefly explain the history of the current conflict between President Charles Taylor and the rebels? Karl Vick: I can but try. In fact the exact chronological origins are not something I lived through or covered. For those, I relied especially on the excellent and well-regarded reports of the International Crisis Group, whose URL may well be www.crisisweb.org
________________________________________________ Washington, D.C.: Do you think the ghost of Somalia looms large in U.S. memory and may be a key reason why we seem loathe to send in help? Karl Vick: Got too. The images that people now have filtered through Ridley Scott's lens were a lot more raw the first time around. The dragging of that soldier's body through the streets of Mogadishu generated what Jackson Diehl and others called the "CNN effect," shorthand for a profound reluctance for Washington to get involved on the ground overseas for higher purposes, but especially in Africa.
________________________________________________ McLean, Va.: Where is Charles Taylor now and who will escort him out of the country? Karl Vick: McLean, or Langley?
________________________________________________ Houston, Tex.: Did you enjoy your stay at the Mammy Yoko? Karl Vick: I was in Freetown only a couple of hours, so I didn't get the opportunity to enjoy any hospitality except the embassy press officer's. But even that short a time shows how turning a place -- Sierra Leone is what we're talking about -- into a UN protectorate does bring in the big money. Looked like aid worker r&r heaven, and consultant city: all those nice new restaurants and hotels.. ________________________________________________ Georgetown, Washington, D.C.: The Post quoted a Liberian as saying that "this is no Somalia" or something to that effect. Those words are still resonating with me. Is that an accurate statement? Karl Vick: All Liberians say this, and rightly so.
________________________________________________ Brentwood, Md.: Having been there yourself, could you describe the extent of the rebel fighting? What kind of peacekeeping mission do you think would be necessary to quell the warfare? In your opinion, are West African troops capable of this alone? Karl Vick: The fighting is weird. Not fighting as we recognize it at all, to a large extent.
________________________________________________ Gaithersburg, Md.: one would say that the delay in the United States sending peace keepers into Liberia is that Liberia is of no importance to them right now. But as soon as the U.S. finds out that Liberia has a reserve of oil that could supply the U.S. for the next century the U.S. will get involve? Karl Vick: There are rumors that Liberia has oil.
________________________________________________ Marshfield, Wis.: It seems to me that Liberia is a chronically chaotic country that, since the end of the Cold War, is of little strategic interest to the United States. I know of no groundswell of public support for sending US troops to such a place, despite the fact that some 200,000 Liberians have died in this most recent civil war. On the other hand, a few hundred British troops were able to end similar chaos in Sierra Leone a few years ago. Do you believe the United States could quickly end hostilities in Liberia, with such a small expenditure of troops, or are the problems of the country intractable? Is there any reason the believe that LURD or Model offers any better future than Mr. Taylor? I have difficulty imagining the U.S. working with the Nigerians and, considering the reputation for criminal activity enjoyed by ECOMOG the last time that they were in Monrovia, I doubt that the Liberians are looking forward to their return. Karl Vick: I can only repeat what Liberians -- or rather Taylor-- says about one US Marine with a whistle. The regard for the US does seem to run deep, but the interviews I did on this pre-dated the latest offensive, which may have generated raw new feelings toward Washington. Witness the angry crowd carrying the dead victims of the mortar strike to lay before the US Embassy. A lot of people may well believe, as Taylor says, that the US has blood on its hands for not moving in before LURD did.
________________________________________________ Arlington, Va.: I understand that private contractors have been supporting UN peacekeepers in Sierra Leone, and previously in the 1990s in Liberia. Any idea how much of a role the private contractors would have in the likely upcoming ECOWAS deployment? Karl Vick: I believe they'd have a role. There was a group in Liberia in the 90s -- former Pentagon types; I'm forgetting the full name, but it began with Pacific, I think. They were sent to oversee ECOWAS (aka ECOMOG in its military incarantion) and shape it up. I heard they had people in Monrovia last week, at the Royal Hotel, but don't think it was confirmed. ________________________________________________ Los Angeles, Calif.: I am an American and lived in Liberia from 1995 to 2000. The Liberians were very friendly and many hoped to someday have enough money to travel to the U.S. How was the response towards you, especially in light of the U.S. not sending troops or any type of assistance in this crisis? Karl Vick: Very warm indeed. Not yet angry when I was there, but increasingly plaintive. ________________________________________________ Alexandria, Va.: There seem to be conflicting reports of which groups are actually responsible for breaking the ceasefire (LURD vs. the government soldiers). Any thoughts? Karl Vick: You can never say. It's always he-said-she-said. Unless you have a cease-fire monitoring apparatus in place like the UN sent to Congo a couple years ago there's no hope of knowing.
________________________________________________ San Diego, Calif.: How far away from the executive mansion are the rebels? I heard they are trying to go around (vs. through the city) to try to encircle Taylor's residence. Thanks. Karl Vick: Not sure at the moment, but when I left they were a good three miles from the executive mansion. Which as the writer seems to appreciate is not where the president lives but rather the high-rise where he works. It's on Capitol Hill, well back from the bridges where the frontal assault on the city is taking place.
________________________________________________ Alexandria, Va.: Your response about whether a West African force would be effective at peacekeeping surprised me. I would expect this time around to be different considering our military's African Crisis Response Initiative program which has helped to train West African peacekeeping forces (because I expect that would bring more accountability for the the actions of the West African troups.) Would you explain further your concerns with a West African led force? Karl Vick: You make a good point. I had meant to mention that as a qualifier. US training should help a lot, as would the example of US troops if they ended up being dispatched. Professionalism has great appeal, if it's appealed to. ________________________________________________ Gaithersburg, Md.: I spent 10 years in the Liberian war (from start to elections) what I have gathered during that time when it comes to U.S. involvement, the U.S. always get cold feet. But as soon as the West African countries start making effort and succeding than the U.S. comes in to take the glory. This is the last chance that the U.S. has to prove that she is a friend to Liberia. Failure to intervene will leave Liberians with negative feelings towards U.S. Karl Vick: Thanks for that. ________________________________________________ Maryland: My understanding from a gentleman from Liberia that I recently met was that there are indeed have natural gas reserves, as well as rich mineral supplies. I also understand that the feeling is that the folks that are there are getting a bit PO'd with the U.S. -- they see that they will move into one country to "render assistance" IF there are resources that can be exploited. Karl Vick: I can't speak to the mineral wealth, potential or otherwise, except that every poor country seems to think it's got some untapped mineral potential that Greater Powers covet. In some cases it's there -- witness Congo -- but lots of times it takes a ton of investment and infrastructure to properly extract -- witness Congo's copper; Congo's col-tan; Congo's gold. So...I dunno. ________________________________________________ Washington, D.C.: Hello Karl, Is there any kind of order? Whats the atmosphere like? Hostile? People walking the streets with guns? Looting? Who is in order there, honestly? Why can't the people of Liberia handle this themselves? Karl Vick: Almost no kind of order. It wasn't quite as bad as Mogadishu when I left, but people who'd been there a while said it seemed to be headed that way.
________________________________________________ Bronx, N.Y.: Most of my father's side of the family is still in Liberia. I see the peacekeeping troops and the U.S.' decision to monitor the situation as a delay tactic. People are dying by the minute and they are monitoring. Monitoring WHAT? Taylor needs to be escorted out because he can not be trusted to leave when he said he would. The fighting won't stop because the rebels are determined to get him out. So we go around in circles and wait and monitor as people die? Makes no damn sense. I am sure if Liberia had oil the U.S. would've been involved already. Taylor is just as bad as Sadaam and Osama. What about regime change in Liberia? We were there for the US when they needed our land during the cold war. Where are they now? How many more bodies must be piled before the U.S. embassy before Bush sends troops to help? Karl Vick: These are the questions you hear in Monrovia, too, albeit in Liberian English. ________________________________________________ Fairfax, Va.:
There is little discussion at the moment regarding Charles Taylor facing the war crimes tribunal. He alone is responsible for four wars in the region -- Liberia, Sierra Leone, Ivory Coast and unrest in Guinea. As someone from Sa Leone, I would like to see him answer for what he did. Two questions:
Karl Vick: Clearly the U.S. is profoundly uncomfortable with the notion of enforcing the war crimes indictment. I assume this is part of why the White House is insisting that he be gone by the time Americans get there (tho US officials say their reluctance is based in not wanting to "legitimize" Taylor by treating the world to the sight of him welcoming US forces).
________________________________________________ Long Beach, Calif.: How much money does Liberia get for registering freighters? Is the money frozen at the moment? Is there a state bank? Does Liberia have it's own currency? Has it collapsed? Karl Vick: I don't know the answer to the registry question, but Taylor's man in charge of it is among the fiercest critics of the U.S., very hawkish on this question. He was on the much-fought-over bridge screaming about US and media hypocrisy as the first mortar shells landed behind us in downtown the other day.
________________________________________________ San Diego, Calif.: Taylor just announced he will resign on July 26, Independence Day. We pray he will keep his word but will he leave the country? This is the big question. Karl Vick: That is is. And I'll leave you all with it.
________________________________________________
| | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||